Methylisothiazolinone
Supports caution/avoidance of methylisothiazolinone in sensitive leave-on positioning due to contact-allergy history.
Castanedo-Tardana MP, Zug KA. Methylisothiazolinone. Dermatitis. 2013;24(1):2–6.
I have extremely sensitive, eczema skin and I would like to know the best preservative or preservation system that would work well with my particular skin type.
For extremely sensitive or eczema-prone skin, the “best” preservation choice is not the strongest preservative and not simply a “natural” preservative. The safest formulation direction is a low-irritancy, fragrance-free, broad-spectrum preservation system that is proven effective in the finished formula by challenge testing.
Because no specific MySkinRecipes preservative product ID has been resolved in this thread, I will keep this as generic formulation guidance, not a recommendation of a specific sold preservative product.
For many leave-on sensitive-skin cosmetics, a reasonable first screening direction is:
For eczema-prone or very sensitive leave-on positioning, I would avoid or be very cautious with:
Parabens are not automatically the worst tolerated preservatives, but suitability depends on brand positioning, regulation, and the user’s own allergy history.
Please verify these before finalizing preservation:
A water-containing product should pass preservative efficacy/challenge testing and microbial limits testing before sale or regular use. For eczema-prone users, also patch test the finished product first. Do not apply to broken, infected, or actively flaring eczema skin unless advised by a dermatologist.
In short: choose the least irritating broad-spectrum system that fits the formula pH, reduce contamination risk with good packaging and clean manufacturing, and prove protection with challenge testing.
Sources supporting the key technical claims in this answer
Supports caution/avoidance of methylisothiazolinone in sensitive leave-on positioning due to contact-allergy history.
Castanedo-Tardana MP, Zug KA. Methylisothiazolinone. Dermatitis. 2013;24(1):2–6.
Supports preservative allergy context, including common allergen preservatives and relative allergy considerations.
Atwater AR, Petty AJ, Liu B, et al. Contact Dermatitis Associated with Preservatives: Retrospective Analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data. Dermatitis. 2021;32(3):151–160.
Supports phenoxyethanol as a commonly assessed cosmetic preservative within regulatory concentration limits, not as a universal best choice.
Lilienblum W, et al. Final version of the Opinion on Phenoxyethanol in cosmetic products. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2016;82:156–159.
Supports the need for preservative efficacy/challenge testing on the finished cosmetic formula.
ISO 11930:2019. Cosmetics — Microbiology — Evaluation of the antimicrobial protection of a cosmetic product.
Supports balancing microbial safety with contact allergy/irritation risk in cosmetic preservation.
Lundov MD, Moesby L, Zachariae C, Johansen JD. Contamination versus preservation of cosmetics: a review on legislation, usage, infections, and contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;60(2):70–78.