Comparison of Polymethylsilsesquioxane and BB Micro Silk for Soft Focus and Coverage
Question
Can you explain the differences between Polymethylsilsesquioxane and BB Micro Silk? I'm interested in their properties related to:
- Soft-focus/blurring effect on wrinkles and pores
- Skin feel/Texture
- Coverage ability
Also, are there other powder ingredients like Mica Powder or Boron Nitride that provide better coverage?
Answer
Comparing Polymethylsilsesquioxane and BB Micro Silk
Both Polymethylsilsesquioxane and BB Micro Silk are soft-focus powders that help to blur the appearance of wrinkles and pores by refracting light. This creates a smoother look on the skin.
Regarding coverage, the coverage ability of Polymethylsilsesquioxane and BB Micro Silk is similar. However, BB Micro Silk is noted to provide a superior skin feel and can hide wrinkles and pores more effectively than some conventional powders.
Here are some key differences:
- Polymethylsilsesquioxane: Primarily works by light refraction for a soft-focus effect. It also contributes to a soft and smooth texture in formulations. It is suitable for filling fine lines.
- BB Micro Silk: Also provides soft-focus and helps conceal wrinkles and pores, described as doing so "more perfectly" than standard silica. It is known for giving a very soft, silk-like texture and is easy to spread.
If you are looking for powders that offer more significant coverage, similar to a foundation, options like Mica Powder and Boron Nitride are recommended. These powders provide better skin coverage while still offering benefits like improving texture and light diffusion (soft-focus, brightness).
Related Products Mentioned
BB Micro Silk™
WhiteMatte3™ (Boron Nitride 3micron)
Mica Powder (20 Micron, Silane Coated)
WhiteShine6™ (Boron Nitride 6micron)
WhiteMatte10™ (Boron Nitride 10micron)