Feedback on Revised Cream Formula with Satin Mousse

Question

I have revised my cream formula using Satin Mousse to achieve an Oil/Silicone in Water texture that is slightly thick, smooth, fast-absorbing, and non-greasy. The formula includes Satin Mousse at 1% and a total oil phase of 17%, along with ingredients like Glycolic Acid, Safflower Oil, MOIST72, and WaterLock at 1%. Is this revised formula appropriate for the desired texture? Also, is WaterLock at 1% compatible with the other ingredients and safe for use with other skincare products?

MySkinRecipes Expert · Accepted Answer

Based on the conversation with the staff, here is a summary of the feedback on your revised formula:

Regarding your revised formula using Satin Mousse:

Emulsifier: Using Satin Mousse is indeed appropriate for achieving an Oil/Silicone in Water cream texture as you desired.
Texture (Thick, Smooth, Fast-absorbing, Non-greasy):
- The staff is concerned that 1% Satin Mousse might not be sufficient to properly emulsify the 17% oil phase, especially with ingredients like glycolic acid which can thin the formula. They recommend increasing Satin Mousse to at least 1.5% or starting with 1% and increasing if the texture is too thin or separates.
- The staff also noted that Safflower Oil and MOIST72 might contribute to a greasy feel. They suggest potentially reducing or removing one or both of these ingredients if you find the final product is too greasy after mixing, and adding them back later if more moisture is needed.
WaterLock Compatibility: WaterLock 1% is compatible with this formula and will not cause issues with other skincare products, unlike some other cationic ingredients.

In summary, the revised formula is a good direction for an O/W/Silicone cream. You may need to adjust the Satin Mousse concentration for proper emulsification and consider the levels of Safflower Oil and MOIST72 if greasiness is a concern. WaterLock is fine to use.