Surfactant Selection for Facial Foam: Lauryl Glucoside vs amino wash, Creamy Foamer vs Baby Foam
Asked by: jn_andy
On: October 08, 2016
Product Type:
Cosmetics
Question
I am formulating a facial foam and have the following questions:
- I am considering replacing
Lauryl Glucosidewithamino wash. What are the pros and cons? - My current formula uses both
Creamy FoamerandBaby Foam. Should I use only one of them or is it fine to use both?
Answer
Based on the staff's advice regarding your facial foam formulation:
- Replacing Lauryl Glucoside with amino wash: Replacing Lauryl Glucoside (ID 177) with amino wash (ID 513) is a good option if you are concerned about eye irritation. Amino wash is generally milder and provides better foam quality compared to Lauryl Glucoside, although it is more expensive. If you choose to keep Lauryl Glucoside, it is crucial to adjust the pH of the formula to avoid skin irritation due to its high alkalinity.
- Using Creamy Foamer and Baby Foam: The staff advises that using either Creamy Foamer (ID 305) or Baby Foam (ID 512) is sufficient for the formula. Baby Foam is milder and can be used in clear formulations but is more expensive than Creamy Foamer. The choice depends on your preference for mildness, clarity, and budget.
