Cosmetics Formulation Development

[quote]Base Composition Ratio 85%: Base Composition Ratio 44.80% (solvent) 20.00% (smooth surface) 10.00% (Surface slippery ) 3.00% (oil-water solder) 3.00% (adjusted pH) 1.00% d-Alpha (Natural ) 1.00% ( ) 1.00% (antioxidant) 0.50% ( Moisturizing) 0.50% (Moisturizing) 0.10% (moisturizing) 0.10% Ingredients 15% Ratio: Component of Ratio Ultra-Fine 15.00%/quote] but would like to modify it so that it can be notified to the FDA, including the formula to be homogenous without exceeding the pH at is unstable and needs to be cut. is removed and the texture The formula is a gel cream that can be put in a pump bottle 1. (Standard) 15% 2. 2% 3. 1% 4 .DMI 3% 5. 3% 6. 2% 7. 2% 8. (99.9%) 4% 9. ( ) 2% (I've tried the 1% mix Unstable gel Classification occurred) 10. 5% 11. ™ 0.05% 12. ™ 0.05% 13. 1% 14. 0.2% 15. 0.2% 16. 0.5% 17. ™ 3% 18. 0.5% 19. 1% 20. 1% (cannot submit 0.5% formula on the website) Can this formula be done or not? Or where should I adjust? The formula is not a clear liquid. I need a bit thicker texture.

More. 21. 2.5% (FDA stipulates not to use more than 2.6% in waste products. on the skin) 22. Water in the rest

Hello, because this recipe The important part is the stability of which according to the original formula the formula inventor Various elements are customized. to be suitable until the level of stability that can be produced and sold normally to adjust any formula New stability tests may be required. The team is unable to comment on the adjustments to this formula. Because the main problem of the formula is the stability of in the formula. must have tools and sufficient expertise To test the stability of

Thank you very much team After studying more information, it was found that 1,3- at 17%, so I thought I'd mix the formula between The Ordinary 8% + 2% used in Dissolution and Kiehl's Powerful-Stren. gth Line-Reducing Concentrate 12.5% suspended in Silicone and Glycols and used in dl-alpha- and to help increase stable for , which projected the formula to look like this: 15% 1% 1% Matte 5% 15% ™ 0.05% ™ 0.1% 3% to that combines Glycols, Oils, Hydrocarbons W 4% reduce chance of settling, thicken, increase stability 1% Added to prevent possible contamination 1,3- % in the remainder. This recipe intentionally includes both dissolved and suspended parts in the formula. It is viscous enough to hold the powder. Please ask the Staff for your opinions on how this formula is. And check to see if it can send a letter to the FDA or not.

Hello, the team doesn't think that this formula can be coordinated. because there are many parts There might be a separation problem.

And if the formula is dissolved to only Oils and Glycols, will it be possible to combine the formula? Cut off Hydrocarbons and change to Esters instead 15% 2% 1% Lipisoft™ Lite 15% ™ 0.05% ™ 0.05% 3% O 5% 1% 1,3- % in the remainder. I think this can be coordinated. But on the website to submit the formula, I don't know how to fill it out because can only contain 20% per field. Is it possible to enter multiple fields?

Hello, I think this can be coordinated For what reason do members think they can coordinate? is emusifier used for synchronization 1,3- is not water. and when used in formulas at high rates even if the formula contains water Formula will have synchronization issue 1,3- itself is insoluble in oil directly. formula like this if able to coordinate Must have high oil and no glycol or diol groups in high rates for whatever reason This formula should therefore be coordinated. Where might the team fall?

5. can comprehend a formula that is a form in oil, glycol in oil (no water in the formula, only and oil or glycol and oil) and when looking at the website that gathers the supplier, found This page https://www.ulprospector.com/en/na/Pers ... thro l-DPHS Cithrol™ DPHS is a versatile for W/O lotions and creams. It has the unique ability to produce very stable fluid viscosity emulsions with excellent freeze/thaw and high temperature stability. Owing to the low viscosity, the emulsions spread easily on the skin and have a light skin feel. Cithrol™ DPHS is based on non-animal sourced raw materials. Cosmetically, this product is recommended for use in very low viscosity W/O emulsions, body milks, high internal phase W/O emulsions, multiple emulsions (W/O/W). , or polyol containing W/O emulsions, after shave balms, water-free G/O emulsion , high electrolyte content W/O emulsions, pigment containing W/O emulsions, sun care, make-up, silicone containing W/O emulsions and foundations. Water-Free Glycol Emulsion is mentioned, that means That the substance itself should be able to combine the oil and glycol formulations without any problems. Interfere with the inspection team.

*** Water-Free Glycol/Oil Emulsion

And there is another one. which this formula uses or is a formula of Kiehl's Powerful-Strength Line-. Reducing Concentrate , , , , , , Crosspolymer, , , Hydroxyethylpiperazine Ethan Sulfonic Acid, Laurel , Acrylonitrile/Methyl Methacrylate/Vinylidene Chloride Copolymer, Polysilicone-11, , Hydrolyzed , , Isobutane, , , , . You will notice that there is no water in the formula at all. Use instead of the whole water part and with is definitely above 10% because is 10.5. % which this kind of formula has not been mentioned by anyone. If you notice a little more, both of these and as in the group both gave the product a liquid texture. But why is it stable in bonding anhydrous formulations and also Glycols, Silicones, in high quantities separately If open search about will contain only The only supplier mentioned Water-Free Glycol/Oil where was not mentioned. If it can't really coordinate the Glycol/Oil formulation, why is it mentioned both on the Supplier and on the myskinrecipes website? please help check Or it would be great if R&D did a test on these two in the form of Glycol/Oil which Of course, it will be good for others as well. And it will be information for customers who come to see it on the web.